Wireless InSite can model Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) to determine if there is a hazard to personnel from a particular high-power EM source. This output is displayed as color coded hazard zones within the GUI of Wireless InSite.

Remcom’s Wireless Insite provides a way to handle uncertainty in a scenario through the use of Monte Carlo parameters for elements within the scenario.  This example demonstrates how to utilize Monte Carlo materials within Wireless InSite to vary material properties quickly and efficiently.

Wireless InSite has a hybrid method that combines the full 3D ray tracing model (X3D) with an empirical model called COST 231 to handle uncertainty with the interior layout of a floor plan. This example demonstrates setting up a typical scenario using the hybrid method.

Wireless InSite provides an efficient , powerful way to analyze a multiple input scenario within an urban environment. This example demonstrates how to utilize Wireless InSite’s Communication Systems Analyzer to calculate total combined power and strongest transmitter for an urban environment.

This example shows the advantages of wedge diffraction over knife-edge diffraction models and semi-empirical models in propagation prediction.

Urban propagation modeling in Helsinki, Finland, using Wireless InSite.

The following example illustrates Wireless InSite's ability to calculate received power and delay spread for a microcellular system located within an urban environment.

Simple indoor propagation modeling example.

To validate MWFDTD over irregular terrain, results were compared to path gain measurements performed by the Institute for Telecommunication Sciences (ITS) in near Longmont, Colorado.

In this example pathloss predictions made with InSite's urban canyon and full 3-D propagation models are compared to measurements made in Rosslyn, Virginia by the group at AT&T Bell Laboratories between December of 1994 and February of 1996.

In this example we use the UCFDTD model to simulate radio wave propagation in Ottawa, Canada.

Propagation prediction for three dimensional terrain.

A 2D Ray tracing example of Bern, Switzerland.

Comparison to path loss measurements in Ottawa, Canada.